Back in 2015, Apple attempted to have the patent re-examined, but the USPTO rejected its request. Apple also attempted to argue that if the patent was valid, it owed a much smaller amount than WARF settled with against Intel; that suit was settled in 2008 with payments of $108 million from Intel to WARF. Apple argued for a fee of 7 cents per device, while WARF initially asked for $400 million and $2.74 per device. The judge’s decision to add $274 million to the initial sum means Apple will wind up paying more than what WARF asked for back in 2014, albeit not the $2.74 figure given how many more millions of iPhones have sold between October 2015 when the first case was decided and the present day. Given that one of the cases against the company hasn’t finished moving through the appeals process, there’s still a possibility of further fines as well Back in 2015, Apple attempted to have the patent re-examined, but the USPTO re...
Tech that matters