Skip to main content

How the Lily Camera Took the Internet by Storm, Then Imploded


Back in 2014, a pair of Berkeley alumni, Antoine Balaresque and Henry Bradlow, had an idea for a camera-equipped drone that had the potential to change the entire drone market. The Lily Camera, “built” by Lily Robotics, was advertised as a dead-simple device that anyone could operate, mostly because it wouldn’t depend on anything as childish as a human pilot. Instead, the Lily Camera was a device you could toss into the air. It would then follow its owner through a combination of image recognition and a bracelet GPS the owner wore on their wrist.
It’s easy to see why the device grabbed the attention of drone enthusiasts, with more than 60,000 pre-orders in 2015. Watch the Lily Camera video below that was shown to potential investors and the public alike. In the video, the drone looks amazing. It captures crisp, clear video; it flies back to the owner when flung off a bridge; and it lands in your hand when you stretch it out. With a waterproof case for the GPS wristband and a pre-order price of $499 (compared with a $999 launch price), it looks like a drone that clearly delivers on the “it just works” promise Silicon Valley has been promising for the last few decades.
Now Wired has an inside look at what caused the company to first delay its hardware for nearly a year, before ultimately filing bankruptcy on the same day it was hit by a lawsuit filed by the District Attorney of San Francisco over the false and misleading advertising it had used to promote its vaporware product.

The problem, in a nutshell, was that Balaresque and Bradlow spent money in all the wrong places, underestimated the difficulty of building both the hardware and the software required to turn the Lily Camera into a product, and — crucially — used a vastly more expensive DJI Inspire to gather their footage rather than the Lily Camera, as they had claimed on stage. More damningly, they trained their director to mimic the way Lily shots would look, to prevent end-users from realizing the footage was fake, while simultaneously worrying about what would happen if people found out.

Early on in the filming process, Balaresque emailed Brad Kremer at CMI Productions, the company Lily Robotics hired to produce the video, about his concerns that a ‘lens geek’ would study the film up close and see that the shots were clearly from an Inspire. ‘But I am just speculating here,’ he wrote. ‘I don’t know much about lenses but I think we should be extremely careful if we decide to lie publicly.’
Because Balaresque and Bradlow put the final video together themselves, even the people who worked to shoot the original film aren’t sure if any of the footage captured is shot from a Lily at all. Both cameras were used in the same process.
But at the same time, not all the employees felt the same way about how things played out. Some defended their former employers as a pair of hard-working guys who made novice mistakes and didn’t listen to the people who were giving them advice, as opposed to being thieving jerks who deliberately set out to defraud people. On at least one point, Wired implies that Lily Robotics was fundamentally honest — it appears to have kept its pledge not to have used pre-order cash to run its company, instead reserving that fund for users who requested refunds.
All the same, this story is a potent reminder that there’s no substitute for engineering expertise and hard work. The Lily Camera was marketed to credulous investors and drone enthusiasts as an amazing advance at a time when drones were just taking off in the mass market. All the beautiful video in the world is ultimately worthless if you can’t deliver a product — and Lily Robotics couldn’t.



Comments

Top

Apple Hacked By A 16 Year Old Teen !

 A Teenage boy pleeded guillty to hack into Apple internal database The 16-year-old accessed 90 gigabytes worth of files, breaking into the system many times over the course of a year from his suburban home in Melbourne, reports The Age newspaper. It says he stored the documents in a folder called 'hacky hack hack'.👻 Apple insists that no customer data was compromised. But The Age reports that the boy had accessed customer accounts. In a statement to the BBC, Apple said: "We vigilantly protect our networks and have dedicated teams of information security professionals that work to detect and respond to threats. "In this case, our teams discovered the unauthorised access, contained it, and reported the incident to law enforcement. "We regard the data security of our users as one of our greatest responsibilities and want to assure our customers that at no point during this incident was their personal data compromised." According to stateme...

All Controller controls all your consoles

Am here to introduce to you the All controller for all standard game consoles... Remember the third party controller your sibling/cousin/friend made you use when you visited his or her house in the NES days? Remember the pain you felt when the joystick wasn’t quite right and they were hosing you on Mortal Kombat while you were busy trying to figure out why your character kept kicking? Well the  All Controller isn’t like that at all. The All Controller is a third party project that, in theory, can be used on any console. You can set up macros and speed buttons and connect to the Xbox, the PS4, or the Switch. It also has a 40 hour battery and can connect to PCs. “Connecting to consoles will be as easy as plugging in the custom USB adapter,” write the creators. “This device will allow the ALL Controller to connect to the XBox 360, XBox One, PlayStation 3 and PlayStation 4. Added support for Nintendo Wii, WiiU and Switch will be added as well. On top of that, the USB adapter wi...

Supercomputer Can Calculate in 1 Second What Would Take You 6 Billion Years

It's shiny, fast and ultrapowerful. But it's not the latest Alpha Romeo. A physics laboratory in Tennessee just unveiled Summit, likely to be named the world's speediest and smartest supercomputer. Perhaps most exciting for the U.S.? It's faster than China's. Hot 100 smartphones The supercomputer — which fills a server room the size of two tennis courts — can spit out answers to 200 quadrillion (or 200 with 15 zeros) calculations per second, or 200 petaflops, according to Oak Ridge National Laboratory, where the supercomputer resides. "If every person on Earth completed one calculation per second, it would take the world population 305 days to do what Summit can do in 1 second," according to an ORNL statement. Put another way, if one person were to run the calculations, hypothetically, it would take 2.3 trillion days, or 6.35 billion years. [9 Super-Cool Uses for Supercomputers] The former "world's fastest supercomputer," called S...